The UK government, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, is preparing to restore its full package of employment rights when the legislation returns to the House of Commons.
The bill, described as the largest upgrade of workplace protections in a generation, has faced amendments in the House of Lords aimed at reducing the potential £4.5 billion annual cost to businesses.
Ministers are now moving to reverse those changes, highlighting a debate that sets workforce security against company costs, and one that could shape the economic balance between labour rights and productivity in the years ahead.
Commons to reverse Lords’ amendments
The legislation has been progressing through Parliament since October 2024.
It was introduced with an impact assessment that estimated the measures could add as much as £4.5 billion to company expenses each year.
This financial burden has been the main reason peers, including members of the Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties, sought to dilute parts of the bill.
Downing Street has confirmed that the government will move to overturn the changes made in the Lords and reinstate the original provisions.
According to Bloomberg, ministers are set to push ahead with reinstating the draft as it was first introduced, ensuring that amendments are reversed when the bill returns to the Commons.
What the workers’ rights bill includes
The bill sets out multiple reforms intended to enhance job security and fairness in the workplace. These include an end to zero hours contracts, replacing them with guaranteed hours for employees.
It also requires employers to pay staff for shifts cancelled at short notice, addressing an area of long-standing concern in sectors reliant on flexible contracts.
In addition, the bill seeks to expand access to statutory sick pay, ensuring more workers are covered and able to rely on basic financial support when unwell.
Collectively, these measures represent a significant shift in employment law, reshaping obligations for businesses and protections for employees.
Economic cost and productivity debate
Business groups have raised concerns about the potential scale of costs, with the £4.5 billion estimate setting the tone for discussions in both Houses.
The government has maintained that strengthening workers’ rights could have the opposite effect, arguing that a secure workforce may lead to higher productivity.
Pares underlined that many businesses already recognise the benefits of stable working conditions, linking secure employment with growth and efficiency.
The balance between protecting workers and managing business costs has long been a dividing line in UK labour policy.
The scale of the reforms makes this bill a test case for how far the government is willing to push worker protections even in the face of financial pushback from companies and parliamentary opposition.
Next steps in Parliament
With the bill set to return to the Commons in the coming weeks, ministers are expected to use the government’s majority to restore the original draft.
The outcome will decide whether the full set of reforms, described as the single largest workers’ rights upgrade in a generation, will become law without dilution.
The debate is likely to remain closely watched by both employers and employees across the UK, as the new rules could reshape workplace practices from flexible contract arrangements to sick pay entitlements.
The coming weeks will determine whether businesses face the higher costs forecast by the impact assessment, or whether the government can offset those pressures with its argument that stronger rights may ultimately support economic growth.
The post UK government to push ahead with £4.5 billion workers’ rights bill despite Lords’ changes appeared first on Invezz
